[ietf78-tech] EDUroam connect request

[Rob Nagy]

I agree as a nice to do. We should be able to radius proxy by realm for people who want to use eduroam credentials. The issue we couldn't probably port to Beijing is that I don't believe we could limit devices per user with a radius proxy realm(have to double check). But for this meeting it should be a fairly easy endeavor, time allowing. 

I will do additional research in how we could do it with freeradius. 

Rob

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:19 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:

> This sort of dovetails with my observation about using open-id auth as 
> an option for the portal...
> 
> personally I'm adverse to simply creating more ssids, but not adverse to 
> the idea of enabling authentication against additional systems.
> 
> On 2010-07-08 08:06, Jim Martin wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Geert Jan de Groot wrote:
>> 
>>> It's not my call to make, I'm not sure if the 1252's
>>> can handle the additional config (but should, yes?),
>>> and I promised I'd forward the request to the list to see what you think?
>> 
>> 
>>    I'd like to put this on the "Nice to do" list....
>> 
>>    That is, if we have cycles and find that we can do it (logistically and technically), then it's a good thing to do.
>> 
>>    However, if we're slammed or it hits any snags, it will be delayed or dropped.
>> 
>>    Paul, are you ok with that?
>> 
>>    On the technical side, would we have a separate (offsite) radius server configured for that one SSID, or would we relay the request (based upon realm or something) from our radius server to theirs?
>> 
>>    - Jim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf78-tech mailing list
>> ietf78-tech at daedelus.com
>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf78-tech
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf78-tech mailing list
> ietf78-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf78-tech