[ietf78-tech] auth token

[Chris Elliott]

Randy,

As I understand it, we are not /requiring/ authentication for Maastricht. Thus option 4.

Chris.


--
Chris Elliott


On Jun 26, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

>> But for Maastricht, you also want a guaranteed-to-work option,
>> correct?
> 
> and also for beijing
> 
>> wireless configuration for Maastricht,
>> usage from most preferred to least:
>> 1) WPA2 w/auth
>> 2) WPA w/auth
>> 3) MAC Address at Switch
>> 4) none
>> 
>> with the assumption that some sort of feedback will be
>> collected about when/where people had to use #4, with
>> the intent of dropping it at Beijing?  Sorry if I'm
>> beating the now dead horse here.
> 
> i am a bit confused here, especially between identity, authentication,
> authorization, and enforcement mechanism(s).
> 
> and i do not understand the role of 4 at all.  if it is not an option
> for beijing, and other options are supposed to work, what is its role?
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf78-tech mailing list
> ietf78-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf78-tech