[ietf78-tech] Admission Control: Just to be completely clear

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Sun Jun 27 20:36:37 PDT 2010


We could Skype, but I'm rudely interrupting dinner already...

I don't mind having one identity and auto token instead of splitting the function. The captive portal isn't picky.

Joel's iPad

On Jun 27, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

>> Not the it helps or anything but John and I will be in the same
>> location at the end of the week it think.
> 
> we could cut through the <bleep> and skype now
> 
>> I think modula the 802.1x digression we have consensus around the following things.
>> 
>> Prototype captive portal
>> A need for two machines
>> Identy token (email address) and secret key (registration code)
>> Hopefully the non mandatory nature of the experiment.
> 
> i am not sure email is wanted/needed for maastricht.  it raises the
> perception of a privacy issue and provides little extra identity over
> the reg key.  my hope is that, for maastricht, the reg keys, or whatever
> token is generated, has redundancy within it.
> 
> randy
> 


More information about the ietf78-tech mailing list