[ietf79-tech] 答复: [?? Probable Spam] Anyone know about these down APs?

[Bill Fenner]

Hewu,

Thanks for the resend of the deployment plan.  I wasn't sure how
closely it was followed.  For example, walking around the valley wing
pre-function area, I was able to find APs 72 and 49, while the plan
says that 47, 48 and 49 are there.  I can't find 72 on the plan at
all, so don't know if it was a spare that replaced a bad AP 47, or was
mis-deployed, or what.  The "what is *actually* where" information is
what there hasn't been enough communication about.

  Bill

2010/11/7 Hewu Li <lihewu at cernet.edu.cn>:
> Bill:
>
> I have sent the AP deployment plan before, and send it again by this email.
> ap154, ap156, ap159 and ap162 are unexpected failures, my colleague would
> check about it soon, thanks.
>
> Hewu
>
>
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: ietf79-tech-bounces at daedelus.com
> [mailto:ietf79-tech-bounces at daedelus.com] 代表 Bill Fenner
> 发送时间: 2010年11月7日 15:47
> 收件人: <ietf79-tech at daedelus.com>
> 主题: [?? Probable Spam] [ietf79-tech] Anyone know about these down APs?
>
> http://noc.meeting.ietf.org/cacti/plugins/monitor/monitor.php
> currently shows ap148, ap149, ap154, ap156, ap159 and ap162 as being
> down.  I don't know what the deployment plan is, or where these APs
> are, or if anyone is watching the monitor.
>
> If these are unexpected failures, netdisco can tell us the switch ports.
>
>  Bill
> _______________________________________________
> ietf79-tech mailing list
> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
>