My guess (reading the latest draft standard) is that they can't share.<br><br>So that will be 2 non-standard networks to build and maintain. Not a big deal, just something we should know about sooner rather than later.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Joel Jaeggli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joelja@bogus.com">joelja@bogus.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
this is port control protocol.<br>
<br>
given that the assumption is that it opening ports in a nat translator I think we can assume that if they want general access that it needs to run in it's own sandbox ssid/vlan. if there are multiple implementations i don't know if they can share or not.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
> Begin forwarded message:<br>
><br>
>> From: Alain Durand <<a href="mailto:adurand@juniper.net">adurand@juniper.net</a>><br>
>> Date: June 24, 2011 11:00:51 AM EDT<br>
>> To: "<<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a>> <<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a>>" <<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a>><br>
>> Cc: "<a href="mailto:iad@ietf.org">iad@ietf.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:iad@ietf.org">iad@ietf.org</a>>, Dave Thaler <<a href="mailto:dthaler@microsoft.com">dthaler@microsoft.com</a>>, Tina Tsou <<a href="mailto:tena@huawei.com">tena@huawei.com</a>>, JACQUENET Christian OLNC/NAD/TIP <<a href="mailto:christian.jacquenet@orange-ftgroup.com">christian.jacquenet@orange-ftgroup.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com">mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com</a>> <<a href="mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com">mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com">mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com</a>>, Joao Damas <<a href="mailto:joao@isc.org">joao@isc.org</a>><br>
>> Subject: Re: A possible PCP demo at the IETF 81 meeting<br>
>><br>
>> Dear Xiahong,<br>
>><br>
>> I was also planning a PCP demo during thhe IETF meeting. Let's sync-up off-line to make it a joint effort.<br>
>><br>
>> - Alain.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:45 AM, <<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a>>> <<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com">xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Dear Ray,<br>
>><br>
>> We would like to take the opportunity of the next IETF 81 meeting in Quebec to set up a PCP demo, in light of the progress of the PCP WG.<br>
>><br>
>> Could you please let us know if this is something feasible and if there is any specific procedure (room reservation, IP address assignment, etc.) that we should follow?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Xiaohong<br>
>> Orange Labs<br>
>> opensource A+P: <a href="http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/" target="_blank">http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>