[ietf86-tech] Fwd: [homenet] renumbering the IETF

[Chris Elliott]

Last email from the thread.


--
Chris Elliott
CCIE # 2013

“You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
--Douglas Hofstadter

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
> Date: February 25, 2013, 11:13:29 PM EST
> To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo at google.com>
> Cc: "homenet at ietf.org Group" <homenet at ietf.org>, Mark Townsley <mark at townsley.net>
> Subject: Re: [homenet] renumbering the IETF
> 
> 
> In message <CAKD1Yr2Hw1V_JHxvqh_BfzFAsMxe_SifvW_GW4J40X=SrpssMA at mail.gmail.com>
> , Lorenzo Colitti writes:
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Mark Townsley <mark at townsley.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing
>>>> I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from
>>>> having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure
>>>> on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning
>>>> would be very interesting!
>>> 
>>> We might as well toss in some ULAs as well.
>> 
>> Hmm. Do we know for sure that all clients properly depref ULAs below global
>> addresses (either because they follow RFC6724 instead of RFC3484, or
>> because they implement the longest prefix matching rule?) If not, some
>> clients might break.
> 
> Longest match works well enough 2001/2002 have 14 bits in common.
> fc00 has no bits in common with 2001 or 2002.  I've been using ULA
> PA addresses together at home for years without issue.
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf86-tech/attachments/20130225/5a0ea8e2/attachment.html