[ietf78-tech] Fwd: nat64 experiment

[Jim Martin]

Randy,
	While I'm not sure I really want to do this this time around, this isn't a new request. We did this last time in Anaheim (as the message noted). Hence, their question is simply "We did this last time, and would like to do the same thing this time. Is that ok?". They got the OK from Russ last time, so I think the political hoops are addressed, or at least had been. I'll ask them to detail their requirements again, so I can forward to the list....

	- Jim

On Jul 22, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> Gentlepeople,
>> 	Opinions?
>>> From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca>
>>> during Anaheim behave wg friday session, we have presented results of
>>> our nat64 experiment. There was large support in the room to continue
>>> doing that experiment in the next ietfs to collect useful operational
>>> data for the protocols and what works and not.
>>> therefore, we would like to setup our nat64 box again in Maastricht.
>>> 
>>> ok by you?
>>> 
>>> Marc.
> 
> there is zero explanation of what the experiment
>  o hopes to achieve
>  o how it hopes to achieve it
>  o how it actually works technically
>  o what its effect on users might be
>  o whether there would be any data retention and the exact nature of
>    it
>  o how it will be monitored not to have deliterious effects
> 
> in addition, considering the current kerfuffle, mark should be prepared
> to give warning and seek consensus on the ietf mailing list.
> 
> randy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf78-tech/attachments/20100722/f4738314/attachment.bin