[ietf79-tech] 答复: 回复： 答复: [?? Probable Spam] Anyone know about these down APs?

[Hewu Li]

Wentao：

 

Good job! Thanks!

 

Best,

 

Hewu

 

 

 

发件人: special [mailto:zhangwtspecial at qq.com] 
发送时间: 2010年11月8日 1:25
收件人: Bill Fenner
抄送: lihewu; lifh; ietf79-tech; jchen07; 张文涛
主题: 回复： 答复: [?? Probable Spam] [ietf79-tech] Anyone know about these
down APs?

 

hi, Bill

 

I'm a student of Hewu. We deployed valley ballroom A and B tonight(Sunday),
and the deployment of Access Points on the three floors used as conference
hall is basically finished.

 

The attachment is the newest AP deployment diagram up to now, and it won't
be changed unless some APs encounter non-recoverable problems. 

 

Please update the monitoring Web page soon if convenient, mainly add the
newly deployed APs and remove the unused APs on the monitor page, then the
NOC can conveniently get the status of all the APs in time.

 

thanks~

 

regards,

Wentao

 

 

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------

发件人: "张文涛"<zhangwt1989 at gmail.com>;

发送时间: 2010年11月7日(星期天) 下午5:16

收件人: "Bill Fenner"<fenner at gmail.com>; 

抄送: "lihewu"<lihewu at cernet.edu.cn>;
"ietf79-tech"<ietf79-tech at daedelus.com>;
"jchen07"<jchen07 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>; 

主题: Re: 答复: [?? Probable Spam] [ietf79-tech] Anyone know about these
down APs?

 

hi all,

 

there is an update for the AP deployement diagram. 

 

54、59、62 was removed for some reason, like providing ethernet ports to the
attendees;
47、48、49、56 was respectively replaced by 59、72、11、03 for certain
hardware problem, and they work well now after changing.

 

I will update the deployement topology later and send it to everyone.

 

Wentao



 

2010/11/7 Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>

Hewu,

Thanks for the resend of the deployment plan.  I wasn't sure how
closely it was followed.  For example, walking around the valley wing
pre-function area, I was able to find APs 72 and 49, while the plan
says that 47, 48 and 49 are there.  I can't find 72 on the plan at
all, so don't know if it was a spare that replaced a bad AP 47, or was
mis-deployed, or what.  The "what is *actually* where" information is
what there hasn't been enough communication about.

 Bill

2010/11/7 Hewu Li <lihewu at cernet.edu.cn <mailto:lihewu at cernet.edu..cn> >:

> Bill:
>
> I have sent the AP deployment plan before, and send it again by this
email.
> ap154, ap156, ap159 and ap162 are unexpected failures, my colleague would
> check about it soon, thanks.
>
> Hewu
>
>
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: ietf79-tech-bounces at daedelus.com
> [mailto:ietf79-tech-bounces at daedelus.com] 代表 Bill Fenner
> 发送时间: 2010年11月7日 15:47
> 收件人: <ietf79-tech at daedelus.com>
> 主题: [?? Probable Spam] [ietf79-tech] Anyone know about these down APs?
>
> http://noc.meeting.ietf.org/cacti/plugins/monitor/monitor.php
> currently shows ap148, ap149, ap154, ap156, ap159 and ap162 as being
> down.  I don't know what the deployment plan is, or where these APs
> are, or if anyone is watching the monitor.
>
> If these are unexpected failures, netdisco can tell us the switch ports.
>
>  Bill
> _______________________________________________
> ietf79-tech mailing list
> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
>




-- 
Wentao Zhang,
Department of Computer Science
Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R.China
Tel: +86-138-1059-9295
Email: zhangwt1989 at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf79-tech/attachments/20101108/faa6e66e/attachment.html