[ietf79-tech] AS290

[Joel Jaeggli]

Ask them if they'll accept a LOA from the holder of record.
the prefix is used with other OriginAS in the normal course of operations.

If that fails, then email Ruediger Volk rv at nic.dtag.de and explain the
situation.

On 10/21/10 8:35 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
> 130.129.0.0 record in ARIN reads an empty origin AS. Deutch Telecom
> won't take it unless origin AS=290 or our AS#. Any idea on how to
> resolve this?
> 
> xzhao at xzhao-desktop:~$ whois -h whois.arin.net <http://whois.arin.net>
> 130.129.0.0
> ...
> NetRange:       130.129.0.0 - 130.129.255.255
> CIDR:           130.129.0.0/16 <http://130.129.0.0/16>
> OriginAS:
> 
> (we can start using 290 from next monday, right? just a safety check)
> 
> thanks,
> Leon
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com
> <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Xiaoliang Zhao <xzhao at cernet.edu.cn
>     <mailto:xzhao at cernet.edu.cn>> wrote:
> 
>>     Great, thanks for clarification, Jim. I will make sure no AS290
>>     from us after Oct. 15th.
>>
>>     We have no problem using private AS, but just to clarify:
>>
>>     1) we can use 130.129/16 anytime, right?
> 
>      Yes ... Feel free to advertise it anytime. 
> 
>>     2) our ISP can be origin AS for 130.129/16, (probably need
>>     register to irr), yes?
>>
> 
>     No problem. If you need help making the RIPE changes, just yell.
>     Alternatively, just ask either of the RIPE guys from Maastricht for
>     help. 
> 
>     - Jim
> 
>>     thanks,
>>     Leon
>>
>>     On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jim Martin <
>>     <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>jim at daedelus.com
>>     <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Leon,
>>                OK, I have a bit of clarity on the use of AS290 now. It
>>         will be being used for Interop New York from October 15th
>>         through the 24th. If you want to use it now until the end of
>>         Thursday, feel free. After that, please don't advertise using
>>         it until the Morning of the 25th. In the mean time, perhaps
>>         you could advertise using a private AS to the lab
>>         infrastructure, and then just strip the AS on the way out?
>>         Sorry for the hassle, but since it actually does belong to
>>         Interop and they have a show running, they obviously have
>>         priority.
>>
>>                - Jim
>>
>>         On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
>>
>>         > > I'm confused. Are you actually advertising the block with
>>         AS290 even though we specifically asked you not to? I don't
>>         see it on
>>         > > routeviews, so we may be ok, but PLEASE, don't advertise
>>         anywhere yet.
>>         >
>>         > my apologies.. I'm too eager for success :) Now, it is stopped.
>>         >
>>         > just a heads-up: we may need your help to deal with Deutch
>>         Telecom. They are our ISP's provider and refused to take
>>         AS290/130.129 from us because it is not in RADB or something
>>         similar. more details will follow once i heard from our ISP.
>>         >
>>         > thanks,
>>         > Leon
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf79-tech mailing list
> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech