[ietf79-tech] AS290
Jim Martin
jim at daedelus.com
Thu Oct 21 23:14:10 PDT 2010
Leon,
I've attached the letter from Interop that has worked for us in the past. Let me know if there's more we can do to help...
- Jim
On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Ask them if they'll accept a LOA from the holder of record.
> the prefix is used with other OriginAS in the normal course of operations.
>
> If that fails, then email Ruediger Volk rv at nic.dtag.de and explain the
> situation.
>
> On 10/21/10 8:35 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
>> 130.129.0.0 record in ARIN reads an empty origin AS. Deutch Telecom
>> won't take it unless origin AS=290 or our AS#. Any idea on how to
>> resolve this?
>>
>> xzhao at xzhao-desktop:~$ whois -h whois.arin.net <http://whois.arin.net>
>> 130.129.0.0
>> ...
>> NetRange: 130.129.0.0 - 130.129.255.255
>> CIDR: 130.129.0.0/16 <http://130.129.0.0/16>
>> OriginAS:
>>
>> (we can start using 290 from next monday, right? just a safety check)
>>
>> thanks,
>> Leon
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com
>> <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Xiaoliang Zhao <xzhao at cernet.edu.cn
>> <mailto:xzhao at cernet.edu.cn>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great, thanks for clarification, Jim. I will make sure no AS290
>>> from us after Oct. 15th.
>>>
>>> We have no problem using private AS, but just to clarify:
>>>
>>> 1) we can use 130.129/16 anytime, right?
>>
>> Yes ... Feel free to advertise it anytime.
>>
>>> 2) our ISP can be origin AS for 130.129/16, (probably need
>>> register to irr), yes?
>>>
>>
>> No problem. If you need help making the RIPE changes, just yell.
>> Alternatively, just ask either of the RIPE guys from Maastricht for
>> help.
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Leon
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jim Martin <
>>> <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>jim at daedelus.com
>>> <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Leon,
>>> OK, I have a bit of clarity on the use of AS290 now. It
>>> will be being used for Interop New York from October 15th
>>> through the 24th. If you want to use it now until the end of
>>> Thursday, feel free. After that, please don't advertise using
>>> it until the Morning of the 25th. In the mean time, perhaps
>>> you could advertise using a private AS to the lab
>>> infrastructure, and then just strip the AS on the way out?
>>> Sorry for the hassle, but since it actually does belong to
>>> Interop and they have a show running, they obviously have
>>> priority.
>>>
>>> - Jim
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I'm confused. Are you actually advertising the block with
>>> AS290 even though we specifically asked you not to? I don't
>>> see it on
>>>>> routeviews, so we may be ok, but PLEASE, don't advertise
>>> anywhere yet.
>>>>
>>>> my apologies.. I'm too eager for success :) Now, it is stopped.
>>>>
>>>> just a heads-up: we may need your help to deal with Deutch
>>> Telecom. They are our ISP's provider and refused to take
>>> AS290/130.129 from us because it is not in RADB or something
>>> similar. more details will follow once i heard from our ISP.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Leon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf79-tech mailing list
>> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 130.129 Authorization.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 61359 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf79-tech/attachments/20101022/09793b8d/attachment-0001.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf79-tech/attachments/20101022/09793b8d/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the ietf79-tech
mailing list