[ietf79-tech] AS290

[Xiaoliang Zhao]

Ok, we will give it a try.

Thanks,
Leon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Martin [mailto:jim at daedelus.com]
> Sent: 2010年10月22日 14:14
> To: Xiaoliang Zhao
> Cc: Li Pengf; ietf79-tech; Joel Jaeggli
> Subject: Re: [ietf79-tech] AS290
> 
> Leon,
> 	I've attached the letter from Interop that has worked for us in
> the past. Let me know if there's more we can do to help...
> 
> 	- Jim
> 
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
> > Ask them if they'll accept a LOA from the holder of record.
> > the prefix is used with other OriginAS in the normal course of
> operations.
> >
> > If that fails, then email Ruediger Volk rv at nic.dtag.de and explain
> the
> > situation.
> >
> > On 10/21/10 8:35 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
> >> 130.129.0.0 record in ARIN reads an empty origin AS. Deutch Telecom
> >> won't take it unless origin AS=290 or our AS#. Any idea on how to
> >> resolve this?
> >>
> >> xzhao at xzhao-desktop:~$ whois -h whois.arin.net
> >> <http://whois.arin.net> 130.129.0.0 ...
> >> NetRange:       130.129.0.0 - 130.129.255.255
> >> CIDR:           130.129.0.0/16 <http://130.129.0.0/16>
> >> OriginAS:
> >>
> >> (we can start using 290 from next monday, right? just a safety check)
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Leon
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com
> >> <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>    On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Xiaoliang Zhao <xzhao at cernet.edu.cn
> >>    <mailto:xzhao at cernet.edu.cn>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>    Great, thanks for clarification, Jim. I will make sure no AS290
> >>>    from us after Oct. 15th.
> >>>
> >>>    We have no problem using private AS, but just to clarify:
> >>>
> >>>    1) we can use 130.129/16 anytime, right?
> >>
> >>     Yes ... Feel free to advertise it anytime.
> >>
> >>>    2) our ISP can be origin AS for 130.129/16, (probably need
> >>>    register to irr), yes?
> >>>
> >>
> >>    No problem. If you need help making the RIPE changes, just yell.
> >>    Alternatively, just ask either of the RIPE guys from Maastricht
> for
> >>    help.
> >>
> >>    - Jim
> >>
> >>>    thanks,
> >>>    Leon
> >>>
> >>>    On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jim Martin <
> >>>    <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>jim at daedelus.com
> >>>    <mailto:jim at daedelus.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>        Leon,
> >>>               OK, I have a bit of clarity on the use of AS290 now.
> It
> >>>        will be being used for Interop New York from October 15th
> >>>        through the 24th. If you want to use it now until the end of
> >>>        Thursday, feel free. After that, please don't advertise
> using
> >>>        it until the Morning of the 25th. In the mean time, perhaps
> >>>        you could advertise using a private AS to the lab
> >>>        infrastructure, and then just strip the AS on the way out?
> >>>        Sorry for the hassle, but since it actually does belong to
> >>>        Interop and they have a show running, they obviously have
> >>>        priority.
> >>>
> >>>               - Jim
> >>>
> >>>        On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Xiaoliang Zhao wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I'm confused. Are you actually advertising the block with
> >>>        AS290 even though we specifically asked you not to? I don't
> >>>        see it on
> >>>>> routeviews, so we may be ok, but PLEASE, don't advertise
> >>>        anywhere yet.
> >>>>
> >>>> my apologies.. I'm too eager for success :) Now, it is stopped.
> >>>>
> >>>> just a heads-up: we may need your help to deal with Deutch
> >>>        Telecom. They are our ISP's provider and refused to take
> >>>        AS290/130.129 from us because it is not in RADB or something
> >>>        similar. more details will follow once i heard from our ISP.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>> Leon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ietf79-tech mailing list
> >> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
> >> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech