[ietf79-tech] Fwd: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation

[Jim Martin]

	It's always been the case in the past. What was the reasoning for not doing it there in Maastricht, and did it prove to be a good move?

	- Jim
On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:

>  I personally think holding the codesprint in the terminal room makes a 
> lot of sense if at all possible.
> 
> On 9/18/10 11:13 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>> Please consider this situation when you put together the network in Beijing.
>>>> From: Tony Hansen<tony at att.com>
>>>>> I personally spent more time diagnosing wireless connectivity issues
>>>>> than being productive. A few hardwired connections would have been useful.
>>> you want us also provide a lot of wired and be done with it, or to spend
>>> more pre-debugging wireless.
>>> 
>>> but i think the sprinters are more linux, and we probably still have problems
>>> with some variants.  so a lot of wires would probably be smart.
>> I do not know what room will be used for the codesprint.  If it is the
>> terminal room, then lots of wires is easy.  If it is some place else,
>> then we'll need to evaluate.  It is clear that some wires will be helpful.
>> 
>> Russ
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf79-tech mailing list
>> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf79-tech mailing list
> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf79-tech/attachments/20100918/60e46813/attachment.bin