[ietf79-tech] Fwd: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation
Russ Housley
housley at vigilsec.com
Sun Sep 19 06:50:54 PDT 2010
Marcia assigned a room other than the terminal room because sh felt that
the terminal room was essentially a hallway. She thought it would have
been difficult for the codesprint to be effective in that space.
Russ
On 9/18/2010 2:36 PM, Jim Martin wrote:
> It's always been the case in the past. What was the reasoning for not doing it there in Maastricht, and did it prove to be a good move?
>
> - Jim
> On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>> I personally think holding the codesprint in the terminal room makes a
>> lot of sense if at all possible.
>>
>> On 9/18/10 11:13 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>>> Please consider this situation when you put together the network in Beijing.
>>>>> From: Tony Hansen<tony at att.com>
>>>>>> I personally spent more time diagnosing wireless connectivity issues
>>>>>> than being productive. A few hardwired connections would have been useful.
>>>> you want us also provide a lot of wired and be done with it, or to spend
>>>> more pre-debugging wireless.
>>>>
>>>> but i think the sprinters are more linux, and we probably still have problems
>>>> with some variants. so a lot of wires would probably be smart.
>>> I do not know what room will be used for the codesprint. If it is the
>>> terminal room, then lots of wires is easy. If it is some place else,
>>> then we'll need to evaluate. It is clear that some wires will be helpful.
>>>
>>> Russ
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ietf79-tech mailing list
>>> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
>>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf79-tech mailing list
>> ietf79-tech at daedelus.com
>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf79-tech
>
More information about the ietf79-tech
mailing list