[ietf83-tech] Why do trunk ports have 'swport access vlan NN' left?

[Chris Elliott]

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> why configuring a monitor port again to debug that RA problem I seem
> to be seeing here still I notcied that there's a swport access vlan 48
> on the port to the AP?   Why is that?  It looks wrong.


Cruft. But not harmful. Does nothing unless port is in access mode.

sw-noc#sh run int gigabitEthernet 0/12

Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 384 bytes
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/12
>  description ap131
>  switchport access vlan 48
>  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,7,8,16,32,80,96,112
>  switchport mode trunk
>  ip access-group killDHCPservers in
>  ipv6 traffic-filter v6_Access_IN in
>  snmp trap mac-notification change added
>  snmp trap mac-notification change removed
>  spanning-tree portfast trunk
> end
>
>
> wej is checking for other exmaples, I'll make him follow-up in case
> there are more.
>
>
> --
> Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
>          Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
> _______________________________________________
> ietf83-tech mailing list
> ietf83-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf83-tech
>



-- 
Chris Elliott
chelliot at pobox.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf83-tech/attachments/20120324/3b29df6f/attachment.html