[ietf86-tech] Fwd: WAPs for Orlando

[Nick Kukich]

My biased opinion:

I've been really happy with the 1142s.  I've seen them comfortably handle
~100 associations.  They're also 50% of the weight and have 100% less
antennas than the 1252s. :)

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com> wrote:

> Gentlepeople,
> A question from Rick. I personally am a bit leery, but I defer to our
> wireless experts....
>
> - Jim
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Rick Alfvin <ralfvin at verilan.com>
> *Subject: **WAPs for Orlando*
> *Date: *February 7, 2013 8:14:48 AM PST
> *To: *Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com>
>
> Hi Jim,
> What would you think about using our 1142s for Orlando instead of the
> 1252s? IETF would save a lot of money on shipping and eliminate the hassle
> of dealing with external antennas. The 1142's have proven to be very robust
> for us and you'd have another performance data point when deciding what to
> replace the 1252's with when the gear is refreshed.
> Thanks for your consideration.
> -Rick
>
> *Rick Alfvin
> VP Business Development*
>
> *Verilan, Inc.
> 7327 SW Barnes Rd. #215
> Portland, OR  97225*
> **
> *Mobile: *+1 (585) 781-0952
> *Email:* ralfvin at verilan.com
> *Skype:* ralfvin.verilan
> *Website:* www.verilan.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf86-tech mailing list
> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech
>



-- 

Nick Kukich

Network Engineer
Verilan Event Services, Inc.
503.710.5115
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf86-tech/attachments/20130207/c5f22b3d/attachment-0001.html