[ietf86-tech] Fwd: WAPs for Orlando

[Jim Martin]

	Do they require the high power POE?

	- Jim

On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Nick Kukich <nkukich at verilan.com> wrote:

> My biased opinion:
> 
> I've been really happy with the 1142s.  I've seen them comfortably handle ~100 associations.  They're also 50% of the weight and have 100% less antennas than the 1252s. :)
> 
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com> wrote:
> Gentlepeople,
> 	A question from Rick. I personally am a bit leery, but I defer to our wireless experts....
> 
> 	- Jim
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Rick Alfvin <ralfvin at verilan.com>
>> Subject: WAPs for Orlando
>> Date: February 7, 2013 8:14:48 AM PST
>> To: Jim Martin <jim at daedelus.com>
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> What would you think about using our 1142s for Orlando instead of the 1252s? IETF would save a lot of money on shipping and eliminate the hassle of dealing with external antennas. The 1142's have proven to be very robust for us and you'd have another performance data point when deciding what to replace the 1252's with when the gear is refreshed. 
>> Thanks for your consideration.
>> -Rick
>> 
>> Rick Alfvin
>> VP Business Development
>> 
>> Verilan, Inc.
>> 7327 SW Barnes Rd. #215
>> Portland, OR  97225
>>  
>> Mobile: +1 (585) 781-0952
>> Email: ralfvin at verilan.com
>> Skype: ralfvin.verilan
>> Website: www.verilan.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf86-tech mailing list
> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Nick Kukich
> 
> Network Engineer
> Verilan Event Services, Inc.
> 503.710.5115

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf86-tech/attachments/20130207/82a9e008/attachment.html