[ietf86-tech] The many VLANs solution.

[joel jaeggli]

Has anyone had a chance to look at their dhcp pd implementation works like?

On 2/21/13 9:18 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> Just a quick status update….
>>
>> I have gotten an MX80 for testing. I *seem* to have configured it 
>> correctly, and it works… some of the time….
>>
>> I suspect the flakiness is simply an artifact of my testing -- I 
>> don't have a spare switch here to make VLANs with, and so I've 
>> plugged my laptop directly into the router, and configured VLANs on 
>> the laptop. I *think* that it is simply not tagging frames correctly…
>>
>> Anyway, I should be able to test some more this evening / tomorrow.
>>
>> Oh, also, from the Bits and Bytes call last week -- we'll be 
>> providing a /24, and routing it to them -- they will take care of 
>> routing it inside the Bits and Bytes area.
>> They would also like some v6 space -- we will need to discuss this 
>> further, as they are looking for a /48, which is probably more than 
>> we can easily provide…
>
>
> Why? We have a /32. There must be 1 /48 left; this is not like
> elsewhere where you have to break a /64 into /80s to have VLANs.
> We shall not strat that.
>
> To my memories we had provided IPSO with 2001:df8:1::/48 last time.
>
>
>
>> There is another B&B call on Friday, and we'll discuss it further then…
>>
>> W
>> ---
>> Schizophrenia beats being alone.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf86-tech mailing list
>> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com
>> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf86-tech mailing list
> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech