[ietf86-tech] Two APs lost their A radios
Colin Doyle
cdoyle at verilan.com
Sat Mar 9 05:10:27 PST 2013
Guess I don't need to be looking at this right now:)
I'm consoled into 3013 and it's and accepting (at least my) association.
The best problems ever are the one that aren't problems at all. Thanks
for the followup, Bill!
C
On 3/9/13 7:46 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I think I was just cross-eyed here. Yes, they report the 1141's
> sysObjectId, but they have "A" radios, and they were up when I was
> investigating. How do I know? Because my phone associated with
> ap3013 while I was exploring looking for the physical hardware:
>
> Mar 9 00:00:57.565 UTC: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio1,
> Station 5426.9651.396f Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2]
> Mar 9 00:02:07.563 UTC: %DOT11-6-ROAMED: Station 5426.9651.396f
> Roamed to 2c36.f8fa.4620
> Mar 9 00:02:07.563 UTC: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio1,
> Deauthenticating Station 5426.9651.396f
>
> (One thing to investigate is that these messages don't appear in
> /var/log/messages on management, either from the syslog or from the
> traps. *some* messages from *some* APs are showing in
> /var/log/messages...)
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Chris Elliott <chelliot at pobox.com
> <mailto:chelliot at pobox.com>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Chris Elliott <chelliot at pobox.com
> <mailto:chelliot at pobox.com>> wrote:
>
> That's interesting. I assume you've checked the power level,
> and it's sufficient to run both radios--check the log
> messages. These APs should be able to run both radios with
> 15.4 watts, but maybe something in the negotiation didn't work.
>
> If all looks good there, I'd suggest rebooting, then, if it's
> still not working, reseating the A radio module.
>
>
> Reseating will require opening them up. I'd recommend replacing
> the APs instead.
>
> Enjoy!
> Chris.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Bill Fenner <fenner at fenron.com
> <mailto:fenner at fenron.com>> wrote:
>
> ap3012 and ap3013 seem to have lost their A radios. They
> even report themselves to be 1141s.
>
> They're both in the same room, so this is probably
> a noticeable loss in "a" coverage.
>
> Bill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf86-tech mailing list
> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com <mailto:ietf86-tech at daedelus.com>
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Elliott
> chelliot at pobox.com <mailto:chelliot at pobox.com>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Elliott
> chelliot at pobox.com <mailto:chelliot at pobox.com>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf86-tech mailing list
> ietf86-tech at daedelus.com
> http://www.daedelus.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf86-tech
--
Colin Doyle
Senior Network Engineer
CCNA, F5 ASP/ATSP, Juniper JES
Verilan Event Services, Inc.
7327 SW Barnes Rd. #215
Portland, OR 97225
Cell: 503 810-2129
cdoyle at verilan.com
www.verilan.com
This e-mail contains proprietary information and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please delete it immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.daedelus.com/pipermail/ietf86-tech/attachments/20130309/e1d6e160/attachment.html
More information about the ietf86-tech
mailing list